nanog mailing list archives
RE: Gtld transfer process
From: Jim Popovitch <jimpop () yahoo com>
Date: Fri, 21 Jan 2005 00:11:58 -0500
I can confirm that ********* did get in touch with our Production Manager (*********) around 1pm Sunday
What I want to know, as a customer of a domain registrar and a holder of many domains, is why wasn't the person/company paying for the domain contacted through out this process? It seems to me that the majority of the communications"was between people who contributed nothing to the domain and had nothing to loose by corruption of the domain. Clearly, in my mind, the process seems broken. Abounding apologies do nothing to assure my concerns that this problem will re-occur. I sincerely doubt that the outcome would be as quick and complete if the domain in question wasn't as substantial as panix.com. -Jim P.
Current thread:
- Re: EPP minutia (was: Re: Gtld transfer process), (continued)
- Re: EPP minutia (was: Re: Gtld transfer process) Eric Brunner-Williams in Portland Maine (Jan 19)
- Re: EPP minutia (was: Re: Gtld transfer process) John Curran (Jan 19)
- Re: Gtld transfer process Brandon Butterworth (Jan 18)
- RE: Gtld transfer process Bruce Tonkin (Jan 18)
- RE: Gtld transfer process Bruce Tonkin (Jan 18)
- RE: Gtld transfer process william(at)elan.net (Jan 19)
- RE: Gtld transfer process Bruce Tonkin (Jan 19)
- RE: Gtld transfer process Bruce Tonkin (Jan 19)
- Re: Gtld transfer process Matt Larson (Jan 20)
- RE: Gtld transfer process Bruce Tonkin (Jan 20)
- RE: Gtld transfer process Jim Popovitch (Jan 20)