RE: improving the registrar transfer process

[Thornton <thornton-nanog () cierragroup com>]

On Fri, 2005-01-21 at 10:28 +1100, Bruce Tonkin wrote:

> Interestingly, the ICANN equivalent in Australia (auDA), does
> pro-actively enforce policies, and even took Capital Networks to court
> on the basis that they could be de-accredited as a registrar for .au, if
> they continued not to allow transfers for .com.
>
> See:
>
>     http://www.austlii.edu.au/au/cases/cth/FCAFC/2004/324.html
>
> The original judgment is at:
>
>     http://www.austlii.edu.au/au/cases/cth/federal_ct/2004/808.html
yes they did. now pacnames in another country supposedly bought
capital...  at least they are allowing you to transfer away this time
though

auDA being proactive is good...now its time icann is...