nanog mailing list archives
Re: Gtld transfer process
From: Eric Brunner-Williams in Portland Maine <brunner () nic-naa net>
Date: Tue, 18 Jan 2005 10:49:58 +0000
There seems to be a general lack of IETF design and review of protocols in this crucial area.
The IETF does not design and review propriatary protocols. VGRS published the RRP specifications. I'm always interested in EPP technical minutia. Eric
Current thread:
- Gtld transfer process Bruce Tonkin (Jan 18)
- Re: Gtld transfer process davidb (Jan 18)
- Re: Gtld transfer process Alexei Roudnev (Jan 18)
- Re: Gtld transfer process Paul G (Jan 18)
- Re: Gtld transfer process Thor Lancelot Simon (Jan 19)
- Re: Gtld transfer process Eric Brunner-Williams in Portland Maine (Jan 19)
- Re: Gtld transfer process Ted Hardie (Jan 19)
- Re: Gtld transfer process Edward Lewis (Jan 19)
- Re: Gtld transfer process Jaap Akkerhuis (Jan 19)
- EPP minutia (was: Re: Gtld transfer process) Eric Brunner-Williams in Portland Maine (Jan 19)
- Re: EPP minutia (was: Re: Gtld transfer process) Eric Brunner-Williams in Portland Maine (Jan 19)
- Re: EPP minutia (was: Re: Gtld transfer process) John Curran (Jan 19)
- <Possible follow-ups>
- Re: Gtld transfer process Brandon Butterworth (Jan 18)
- RE: Gtld transfer process Bruce Tonkin (Jan 18)
- RE: Gtld transfer process Bruce Tonkin (Jan 18)
- RE: Gtld transfer process william(at)elan.net (Jan 19)
(Thread continues...)