nanog mailing list archives
Re: IPv6, IPSEC and DoS
From: "Christopher L. Morrow" <christopher.morrow () mci com>
Date: Mon, 03 Jan 2005 19:40:00 +0000 (GMT)
On Mon, 3 Jan 2005, Joe Abley wrote:
On 3 Jan 2005, at 11:11, David Barak wrote:I guess it's true that everything old is new again: isn't this effectively circuit-switching?No, it's packet-switching with a provisioning process reminiscent of the Book of Telco. Static provisioning does not a circuit make.
you could go one step further to make it circuit switching and static route all traffic in both directions to the individual /128's... talk about FUN!
Current thread:
- Re: IPv6, IPSEC and DoS, (continued)
- Re: IPv6, IPSEC and DoS Rob Thomas (Jan 01)
- Re: IPv6, IPSEC and DoS Iljitsch van Beijnum (Jan 02)
- Re: IPv6, IPSEC and DoS Valdis . Kletnieks (Jan 01)
- Re: IPv6, IPSEC and DoS Iljitsch van Beijnum (Jan 02)
- Re: IPv6, IPSEC and DoS Valdis . Kletnieks (Jan 02)
- Re: IPv6, IPSEC and DoS Rob Thomas (Jan 01)
- Re: IPv6, IPSEC and DoS J. Oquendo (Jan 03)
- Re: IPv6, IPSEC and DoS Iljitsch van Beijnum (Jan 03)
- Re: IPv6, IPSEC and DoS David Barak (Jan 03)
- Re: IPv6, IPSEC and DoS Joe Abley (Jan 03)
- Re: IPv6, IPSEC and DoS David Barak (Jan 03)
- Re: IPv6, IPSEC and DoS Christopher L. Morrow (Jan 03)
- Re: IPv6, IPSEC and DoS Sean Donelan (Jan 03)
- Re: IPv6, IPSEC and DoS Todd Vierling (Jan 03)
- Re: IPv6, IPSEC and DoS Iljitsch van Beijnum (Jan 03)