nanog mailing list archives

Re: IPv6, IPSEC and deep packet inspection


From: Sean Donelan <sean () donelan com>
Date: Sat, 1 Jan 2005 22:09:24 -0500 (EST)


That depends very much on what is being reached. Would it be reasonable
for a.gtld-servers.net and b.gtld-servers.net to start silently
blocking v6 datagrams on a whim?

There are *.root-servers.net (or the networks they're behind) which
have/do block v4 datagrams on a whim, political winds, or the phase of
the moon.  Sometimes they drop them from just certain countries.  Other
times its difficult for the external observer to guess their motivation.

On the other hand, all the gtld-servers.net happen to be operated by a
single organization.  What does their contract say they can do with v6,
v4 or DECNET packets?  Are they required to provide v4 or v6 service at
all?

Its amazing how sometimes people want providers to drop all sorts of
packets, and other times people get upset when providers drop all sorts
of packets.

ipv6
e-dns
smtp
netbios
icmp
net-10.0.0.0
multicast
directed-broadcast


Current thread: