RE: NANOG Changes

["Hannigan, Martin" <hannigan () verisign com>]

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Bill Nash [mailto:billn () billn net]
> Sent: Monday, February 21, 2005 9:53 PM
> To: Hannigan, Martin
> Cc: William Allen Simpson; nanog () merit edu
> Subject: RE: NANOG Changes
>
>
> On Sun, 20 Feb 2005, Hannigan, Martin wrote:
>
> > [ snip ]
> >
> > > As I was browsing the archive, I
> > > noticed my post and his and another one from William Leizon
> > > that quoted
> > > mine have been removed from it.
> >
> > > From what I understand, the archive feature wasn't turned on until
> > just before the first post that was actually archived appeared.
>
> So, now that archiving is on (for those of us reading the 
> archive instead 
> of subbing to the traffic), can those posts be resubmitted 
> for the sake of 
> posterity?

Bill;

Let me correct a mischaracterization. I have nothing to do
with any technical or administrative issue on nanog-futures.
I'm just a poster like anyone else.

As far as the nanog-futures archive goes? You'd think it
would be a relatively simple operation to add something that's
missing. How about just resending it as a "historical
note" and if some person feels really strongly that it
must be authenticated, by all means, PGP sign it.

-M<