Re: Receiving route with metric 0

[Glen Kent <glen.kent () gmail com>]

Am all the more confused now :)

> > In pre-RFC1058 implementations the sender increments the metric, so a
> > directly-connected route's metric is 1 on the wire.
> >
> > In post-RFC1058 implementations the receiver increments the metric, so
> > a directly-connected route's metric is 0 on the wire.
> >
> > In both cases, the metric in a reciever's database one hop away is 1.

Lets say we have A -- B. A is pre-RFC1058 and B is post RFC 1058. A
sends a directly connected route as 1. B increments this by 1, and
thus stores it as 2.

> You appear to have it backwards. As it says in the section you quoted,
>
>        "These two viewpoints result in identical update messages being
>        sent."
>
> Either approach results in messages with metric 1. The metrics on the

Hmmm .. not sure. A post 1058 implementation would send a metric 0 for
a directly connected route, assuming that the other end would
increment the value and things would work out fine.

Thanks,
Glen