nanog mailing list archives
Re: Bogon stupidity... warning... operational post.
From: "william(at)elan.net" <william () elan net>
Date: Thu, 22 Dec 2005 10:21:43 -0800 (PST)
On Thu, 22 Dec 2005, Robert Boyle wrote:
At 12:56 PM 12/22/2005, you wrote: P.S. 204/8 was not the only problem, there were problems with 128/8 and133/8 as well so my apologies to people who may have noticed problems overnight.199.128.0.0/9 too.
Yes, legacy blocks (with large number of smaller allocations) whenever datasize during processing exceeded certain amount. The bad data was present at 2 of 4 servers for duration of the night but dns was being changes same time as well, so I don't know how much affect there was
but apparently considerable; this is the most serious problem in months. -- William Leibzon Elan Networks william () elan net
Current thread:
- Bogon stupidity... warning... operational post. Rodney Joffe (Dec 22)
- Re: Bogon stupidity... warning... operational post. william(at)elan.net (Dec 22)
- Re: Bogon stupidity... warning... operational post. Rodney Joffe (Dec 22)
- Re: Bogon stupidity... warning... operational post. william(at)elan.net (Dec 22)
- Re: Bogon stupidity... warning... operational post. Robert Boyle (Dec 22)
- Re: Bogon stupidity... warning... operational post. william(at)elan.net (Dec 22)
- Re: Bogon stupidity... warning... operational post. Christopher L. Morrow (Dec 22)
- Re: Bogon stupidity... warning... operational post. Daniel Golding (Dec 22)
- Re: Bogon stupidity... warning... operational post. Christopher L. Morrow (Dec 22)
- Re: Bogon stupidity... warning... operational post. william(at)elan.net (Dec 22)
- Re: Bogon stupidity... warning... operational post. Rodney Joffe (Dec 22)
- Re: Bogon stupidity... warning... operational post. william(at)elan.net (Dec 22)
- <Possible follow-ups>
- RE: Bogon stupidity... warning... operational post. Hannigan, Martin (Dec 22)
- RE: Bogon stupidity... warning... operational post. JP Velders (Dec 22)