nanog mailing list archives
Re: #nanog: was Re: http://weblog.disgu.st down
From: Gadi Evron <ge () linuxbox org>
Date: Thu, 22 Dec 2005 04:06:02 +0200
Daniel Roesen wrote:
On Wed, Dec 21, 2005 at 02:30:18PM -0600, Albert Meyer wrote:I'd like to see a useful #nanog where network operators could chat.That channel does exist but is not NANOG-related. Some #nanog folks who do want to finally chat on-topic hang out there. Quote from one of them: "dude, this is prolly the most on topic IRC channel I was ever in". :-) Fortunately, even with currently almost 200 folks in it, there is enough self discipline to stay mostly on topic.
It looked more like an 3l33t hax0rs channel to me when I visited. Gadi.
Current thread:
- http://weblog.disgu.st down Tyrone Chickenbone (Dec 21)
- Re: http://weblog.disgu.st down william(at)elan.net (Dec 21)
- Re: http://weblog.disgu.st down Andrew Kirch (Dec 21)
- #nanog: was Re: http://weblog.disgu.st down Albert Meyer (Dec 21)
- Re: #nanog: was Re: http://weblog.disgu.st down chip (Dec 21)
- Re: #nanog: was Re: http://weblog.disgu.st down Albert Meyer (Dec 21)
- Re: #nanog: was Re: http://weblog.disgu.st down Daniel Roesen (Dec 21)
- Re: #nanog: was Re: http://weblog.disgu.st down Gadi Evron (Dec 21)
- Re: #nanog: was Re: http://weblog.disgu.st down Daniel Roesen (Dec 21)
- Re: http://weblog.disgu.st down Andrew Kirch (Dec 21)
- Re: http://weblog.disgu.st down william(at)elan.net (Dec 21)
- Re: #nanog: was Re: http://weblog.disgu.st down Paul Vixie (Dec 21)