nanog mailing list archives
RE: Addressing versus Routing (Was: Deploying IPv6 in a datacenter)
From: "Hannigan, Martin" <hannigan () verisign com>
Date: Wed, 21 Dec 2005 18:42:45 -0500
Thus spake <sysadmin () citynetwireless net>On Wed, Dec 21, 2005 at 11:36:00PM +0100, Daniel Roesen wrote:
Last time I checked, Ethernet is still CSMA/CD.
Ok, sure, half-duplex. People using auto-neg.
Only if you're running half-duplex, which is generally an error condition in modern networks.
And inter(frame)gap delay. http://www.merit.edu/mail.archives/nanog/1997-11/msg00189.html This is why, IIRC, rs would have to wake up and go down to the MAE and reboot the giggle switch. -M<
Current thread:
- RE: Addressing versus Routing (Was: Deploying IPv6 in a datacenter) Hannigan, Martin (Dec 21)
- Re: Addressing versus Routing (Was: Deploying IPv6 in a datacenter) Daniel Roesen (Dec 21)
- <Possible follow-ups>
- RE: Addressing versus Routing (Was: Deploying IPv6 in a datacenter) Hannigan, Martin (Dec 21)
- RE: Addressing versus Routing (Was: Deploying IPv6 in a datacenter) Hannigan, Martin (Dec 21)
- Re: Addressing versus Routing (Was: Deploying IPv6 in a datacenter) Andrew Dul (Dec 22)