nanog mailing list archives
RE: QoS for ADSL customers
From: Sean Donelan <sean () donelan com>
Date: Thu, 1 Dec 2005 13:28:31 -0500 (EST)
On Thu, 1 Dec 2005, Ejay Hire wrote:
Going back to your original question, how to keep from saturating the network with residential users using bittorrent/edonkey et al, while suffocating business customers. Here goes.
I still don't see the requirement for application level classification. The original request only mentioned differenting between Corp. customers and other customers; not the applications they are using.
Current thread:
- Re: QoS for ADSL customers Kim Onnel (Dec 01)
- RE: QoS for ADSL customers Ejay Hire (Dec 01)
- Re: QoS for ADSL customers Kim Onnel (Dec 01)
- RE: QoS for ADSL customers Ejay Hire (Dec 01)
- RE: QoS for ADSL customers Ray Burkholder (Dec 01)
- RE: QoS for ADSL customers Scott Morris (Dec 01)
- Re: QoS for ADSL customers Mikael Abrahamsson (Dec 01)
- Re: QoS for ADSL customers Kim Onnel (Dec 01)
- RE: QoS for ADSL customers Sean Donelan (Dec 01)
- RE: QoS for ADSL customers Joe Shen (Dec 06)
- RE: QoS for ADSL customers william(at)elan.net (Dec 06)
- RE: QoS for ADSL customers Ejay Hire (Dec 06)
- RE: QoS for ADSL customers william(at)elan.net (Dec 06)
- RE: QoS for ADSL customers william(at)elan.net (Dec 06)
- RE: QoS for ADSL customers Ejay Hire (Dec 01)
- Re: QoS for ADSL customers Greg Boehnlein (Dec 01)
- <Possible follow-ups>
- Re: QoS for ADSL customers Neil Harris (Dec 01)
- RE: QoS for ADSL customers Church, Chuck (Dec 01)
- Re: QoS for ADSL customers Miquel van Smoorenburg (Dec 02)