nanog mailing list archives

Re: Viral Cure Could 'Immunise' The Internet


From: sgorman1 () gmu edu
Date: Fri, 09 Dec 2005 10:46:50 -0500



Keep in mind the study was done by physicists, who while brilliant, cannot be bothered with operational realities that 
prevent their equations from being elegant.  

Still an interesting hypothesis on how to leverage network structure to fight infections - this assumes you buy into 
the whole Internet is "scale free" argument to begin with.

----- Original Message -----
From: Simon Waters <simonw () zynet net>
Date: Friday, December 9, 2005 10:34 am
Subject: Re: Viral Cure Could 'Immunise' The Internet


On Friday 09 Dec 2005 14:57, you wrote:

a mathematical study is going to come up with a result that is more
meaningful.

The story is badly headlined. 

The study is saying how many "canaries" do we need to keep the 
Internet safe, 
or how big the immune system needs to be, not about a viral cure 
as such.

It says to keep the infection rate of new malware down to a 
fraction of a 
percent we'd need about a million or so machines looking for 
malware (on some 
assumptions).

Should convince someone that we need to change the assumptions. 
Hopefully the 
modelling says something about what factors it is sensitive to.

It does however remind me of the comparison of engineering and 
science, a 
scientist will earn a living by taking a really difficult problem 
and spends 
many  years solving it, an engineer earns a living by finding 
really 
difficult problems and side stepping them.



Current thread: