nanog mailing list archives

Re: Operational: Wiltel Peering with MCI problems around D.C


From: Richard A Steenbergen <ras () e-gerbil net>
Date: Thu, 18 Aug 2005 16:13:27 -0400


On Thu, Aug 18, 2005 at 03:41:56PM -0400, Rich Emmings wrote:

Anyone else (Wiltel customers especially) running into an operational issue 
around D.C. with partial connectivity

It would seem MCI and Wiltel around D.C. have a 'informal' peering 
relationship and it's been errored right now for about 39 hours with a 
half-duplex route announcement.  This has been effecting us with some loss 

Informal peering relationship with a half duplex route announcement? Is 
this some really obscure way of saying someone is leaking routes? Trust 
me, there is no such thing as an "informal" peering relationship with MCI.

of connectivity that's not there when we test same sites from other ISP 
clouds.  Since it's informal, the help desk system at one or both ands may 
be having problem entering a ticket w/o an account number for the circuit.

I don't think so. Whether it is a peer or a transit relationship, nothing 
that big between those parties is informal, undocumented, or unticketable. 
Besides, in this case, WCG buys transit from MCI:

GigabitEthernet5-0.GW4.IAD8.ALTER.NET (157.130.30.245)

Name:    wcgGigE-gw2.customer.alter.net
Address:  157.130.30.246

I will take your word tht something is broken though, as the traceroute 
from Washington DC to www.mci.com via http://lookingglass.wcg.net is:

Tracing the route to global.mci.com (164.109.35.20)

1 so-0-0-0.edge2.Washington1.Level3.net (4.68.127.25) [AS 3356] 0 msec 0 msec 0 msec
2 * * * 
3 * * *
...

The usual channels are not producting results, and we're starting to get 
engineers on the lower end of the evoluationary food chain and finger 
pointing between wgc & mci that's not helping.  Tried a pch, haven't heard 
yet.

Are you actually a customer of either one? If so, you ring them up and 
stay on the phone until they address the problem. If not, take a stab at 
it that WCG is the most interested party in getting it fixed, and try 
nagging them some more. :)

-- 
Richard A Steenbergen <ras () e-gerbil net>       http://www.e-gerbil.net/ras
GPG Key ID: 0xF8B12CBC (7535 7F59 8204 ED1F CC1C 53AF 4C41 5ECA F8B1 2CBC)


Current thread: