nanog mailing list archives
Re: Blocking certain terrorism/porn sites and DNS
From: Florian Weimer <fw () deneb enyo de>
Date: Thu, 18 Aug 2005 17:26:46 +0200
Why not just bring back the "evil bit" as a serious proposal?
I've recently discovered a useful application for the evil bit: sandboxes for mobile code (think Java applets) can use it to instruct firewalls not to open additional ports just because a client sends a "PORT" command on a port 21/TCP connection. 8-)
Current thread:
- Re: Blocking certain terrorism/porn sites and DNS, (continued)
- Re: Blocking certain terrorism/porn sites and DNS Randy Bush (Aug 18)
- Re: Blocking certain terrorism/porn sites and DNS Abhishek Verma (Aug 18)
- Re: Blocking certain terrorism/porn sites and DNS Daniel Golding (Aug 18)
- Re: Blocking certain terrorism/porn sites and DNS Jeffrey I. Schiller (Aug 18)
- Re: Blocking certain terrorism/porn sites and DNS Conrad (Aug 18)
- Re: Blocking certain terrorism/porn sites and DNS Steven Champeon (Aug 18)
- Re: Blocking certain terrorism/porn sites and DNS Randy Bush (Aug 18)
- Re: Blocking certain terrorism/porn sites and DNS William Allen Simpson (Aug 18)
- Re: Blocking certain terrorism/porn sites and DNS bmanning (Aug 18)
- Re: Blocking certain terrorism/porn sites and DNS Geo. (Aug 18)
- Re: Blocking certain terrorism/porn sites and DNS Florian Weimer (Aug 18)
- Message not available
- Re: Blocking certain terrorism/porn sites and DNS Jay R. Ashworth (Aug 18)
- Re: Blocking certain terrorism/porn sites and DNS Steven J. Sobol (Aug 18)
- Re: Blocking certain terrorism/porn sites and DNS Abhishek Verma (Aug 18)
- Re: Blocking certain terrorism/porn sites and DNS Randy Bush (Aug 18)
- Re: Blocking certain terrorism/porn sites and DNS Hyunseog Ryu (Aug 18)