nanog mailing list archives
Re: DSL Network Design Question
From: Jon Lewis <jlewis () lewis org>
Date: Sun, 14 Aug 2005 11:14:05 -0400 (EDT)
On Sun, 14 Aug 2005, Robert E.Seastrom wrote:
Peter Dambier is right that his ISP is avoiding .255 and .0. Older MS stacks (still plenty prevalent in the wild) get indigestion when handed those final octets, notwithstanding the fact that they aren't broadcast addresses on any network larger than a /24 or for one-ended use like PPP... if you don't exclude them you'll end up putting additional load on your help desk.
Believe it or not, even not too old (12.1T) IOS versions have issues forwarding packets to .255 addresses.
---------------------------------------------------------------------- Jon Lewis | I route Senior Network Engineer | therefore you areAtlantic Net | _________ http://www.lewis.org/~jlewis/pgp for PGP public key_________
Current thread:
- DSL Network Design Question surfer () mauigateway com (Aug 13)
- Re: DSL Network Design Question Peter Dambier (Aug 14)
- Re: DSL Network Design Question Robert E . Seastrom (Aug 14)
- Re: DSL Network Design Question Jon Lewis (Aug 14)
- Re: DSL Network Design Question Roy Badami (Aug 14)
- Re: DSL Network Design Question Jon Lewis (Aug 14)
- Re: DSL Network Design Question Roy Badami (Aug 14)
- Re: DSL Network Design Question Jon Lewis (Aug 14)
- Re: DSL Network Design Question Roy Badami (Aug 14)
- Re: DSL Network Design Question Jon Lewis (Aug 14)
- Re: DSL Network Design Question (Aug 15)
- Re: DSL Network Design Question Mark Foster (Aug 15)
- Re: DSL Network Design Question Jon Lewis (Aug 14)