RE: "Cisco gate" and "Meet the Fed" at Defcon....

[trainier () kalsec com]

The "nanog problem" was clearly stated.  It had nothing to do with the 
specific discussion, but more that the discussion contained
instances where folks were being insulting and crude. 

Tim Rainier




Randy Bush <randy () psg com> 
Sent by: owner-nanog () merit edu
08/02/2005 03:39 PM

To
"Chris Ranch" <CRanch () Affinity com>
cc
Bjørn Mork <bjorn () mork no>, "Christopher L. Morrow" 
<christopher.morrow () mci com>, <nanog () merit edu>
Subject
RE: "Cisco gate" and "Meet the Fed" at Defcon....







> But the vulnerability applies for only ipv6-enabled devices...
> http://www.cisco.com/warp/public/707/cisco-sa-20050729-ipv6.shtml

the general problem is definitely wider than the v6 hole.  i
believe, but of course could be wrong, that the april fix was a
bit wider than v6.

the blackhat/nanog problem is that, if we are not allowed to
discuss these things openly, all is conjecturbation.

randy