nanog mailing list archives
Re: IPv6 Address Planning
From: Iljitsch van Beijnum <iljitsch () muada com>
Date: Wed, 10 Aug 2005 20:36:49 +0200
On 10-aug-2005, at 20:13, Randy Bush wrote:
the ivtf
?
people are giving out prefixes as needed, not just the religious /48.
Yes, and ISPs have historically done so well determining what people "need".
Power to the people.
Current thread:
- Re: IPv6 Address Planning, (continued)
- Re: IPv6 Address Planning bmanning (Aug 10)
- Re: IPv6 Address Planning Iljitsch van Beijnum (Aug 10)
- Re: IPv6 Address Planning bmanning (Aug 10)
- Re: IPv6 Address Planning Iljitsch van Beijnum (Aug 10)
- Re: IPv6 Address Planning bmanning (Aug 10)
- Re: IPv6 Address Planning Randy Bush (Aug 10)
- Re: IPv6 Address Planning Mark Andrews (Aug 10)
- Re: IPv6 Address Planning Daniel Senie (Aug 10)
- Re: IPv6 Address Planning Leo Bicknell (Aug 10)
- Re: IPv6 Address Planning Randy Bush (Aug 10)
- Re: IPv6 Address Planning Iljitsch van Beijnum (Aug 10)
- Re: IPv6 Address Planning David Conrad (Aug 10)
- Re: IPv6 Address Planning Iljitsch van Beijnum (Aug 10)
- Re: IPv6 Address Planning Roy Badami (Aug 10)
- Re: IPv6 Address Planning Kevin Loch (Aug 10)
- Re: IPv6 Address Planning Roy Badami (Aug 10)
- Re: IPv6 Address Planning Iljitsch van Beijnum (Aug 11)
- Re: IPv6 Address Planning David Conrad (Aug 10)
- Re: IPv6 Address Planning Iljitsch van Beijnum (Aug 10)