nanog mailing list archives
Re: as numbers
From: Joe Abley <jabley () isc org>
Date: Mon, 1 Aug 2005 15:00:14 -0400
On 1 Aug 2005, at 06:15, Stephen J. Wilcox wrote:
On Sun, 31 Jul 2005, Geoff Huston wrote:So - to NANOG at large - if you want your vendor to include 4-Byte AS support in their BGP code anytime soon, in order to avoid some last minute panic in a couple of years hence, then it would appear that you should talk to them now and say clearly that you want 4-Byte AS support in your BGP software rightnow.Geoff, excellent idea..before I forward this email to my suppliers tho, is there a reference I can send.. excuse my ignorance but I'm not familiar with research done on 4-byteASNs, is there a proposed standard implementation?If I have something definite to request I will immediately send those emails,
draft-ietf-idr-as4bytes-10 seems to be the document to point them at. http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-ietf-idr-as4bytes-10.txt Joe
Current thread:
- Re: as numbers Daniel Karrenberg (Aug 01)
- Re: as numbers bmanning (Aug 01)
- <Possible follow-ups>
- Re: as numbers Stephen J. Wilcox (Aug 01)
- Re: as numbers Joe Abley (Aug 01)
- Message not available
- Re: as numbers Geoff Huston (Aug 01)
- Re: as numbers william(at)elan.net (Aug 01)
- Re: as numbers Gaurab Raj Upadhaya (Aug 01)