nanog mailing list archives
Re: Slashdot: Providers Ignoring DNS TTL?
From: Jim Popovitch <jimpop () yahoo com>
Date: Tue, 19 Apr 2005 12:11:55 -0400
On Tue, 2005-04-19 at 15:47 +0000, Fergie (Paul Ferguson) wrote:
Interesting thread on /. -- http://ask.slashdot.org/article.pl?sid=05/04/18/198259&tid=95&tid=128&tid=4
The original poster doesn't identify what his starting TTL was before he made his change. I didn't read all the responses, but I can see how an original 14 day TTL could take 4 weeks to propagate from master to end- user, given the amount of testing he/she was doing *prior* to making the change. -Jim P.
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
Current thread:
- Slashdot: Providers Ignoring DNS TTL? Fergie (Paul Ferguson) (Apr 19)
- Re: Slashdot: Providers Ignoring DNS TTL? Jim Popovitch (Apr 19)
- Re: Slashdot: Providers Ignoring DNS TTL? Crist Clark (Apr 19)
- Re: Slashdot: Providers Ignoring DNS TTL? Dean Anderson (Apr 20)
- Re: Slashdot: Providers Ignoring DNS TTL? sthaug (Apr 20)
- Re: Slashdot: Providers Ignoring DNS TTL? Dean Anderson (Apr 20)
- Re: Slashdot: Providers Ignoring DNS TTL? Chris Adams (Apr 20)
- Re: Slashdot: Providers Ignoring DNS TTL? Valdis . Kletnieks (Apr 20)
- Re: Slashdot: Providers Ignoring DNS TTL? Dean Anderson (Apr 22)
- Re: Slashdot: Providers Ignoring DNS TTL? Stephen J. Wilcox (Apr 20)
- Re: Slashdot: Providers Ignoring DNS TTL? Dean Anderson (Apr 22)
- Re: Slashdot: Providers Ignoring DNS TTL? Stephen J. Wilcox (Apr 23)
- Re: Slashdot: Providers Ignoring DNS TTL? Dean Anderson (Apr 20)