nanog mailing list archives
Re: RFC1918 in-addr.arpa local copies
From: Paul Vixie <vixie () vix com>
Date: 16 Apr 2005 04:18:49 +0000
fwc () mt net ("Forrest W. Christian") writes:
1) Is there a good reason why I shouldn't host a local copy of the RFC1918 in-addr zones on my servers?
according to RFC 1918, you should do this.
2) I've dug around and haven't been able to find an example of a RFC1918 zone file ala what's on the official servers. I'm assuming that these are basically just empty domain filas but I'd love to verify that this is the case. Of course, the blackhole servers I tried don't respond to AXFR.
an empty zone (except for the SOA and NS) works pretty well.
3) Alternatively, I could host a local anycast instance of these servers, but I can think of lots of good reasons why this might be bad.
more is better. -- Paul Vixie
Current thread:
- RFC1918 in-addr.arpa local copies Forrest W. Christian (Apr 15)
- Re: RFC1918 in-addr.arpa local copies Christopher L. Morrow (Apr 15)
- Re: RFC1918 in-addr.arpa local copies Paul Vixie (Apr 15)