nanog mailing list archives
Re: AUP for NANOG?
From: Randy Bush <randy () psg com>
Date: Thu, 14 Apr 2005 11:45:22 -0400
This reminds me of the way others behaved when I entered the field some 25 years ago. Some people were very helpful and friendly. Others responded very arrogantly with the tone of "how stupid you are for asking that question."I didn't know you read misc () openbsd org or questions () freebsd org ... :)
you wanna see bad second grade playground behavior, try the asterisk mailing list. randy
Current thread:
- AUP for NANOG? Matthew Black (Apr 14)
- Re: AUP for NANOG? Randy Bush (Apr 14)
- Re: AUP for NANOG? Edward Lewis (Apr 14)
- Re: AUP for NANOG? Chris Kuethe (Apr 14)
- Re: AUP for NANOG? Randy Bush (Apr 14)
- Re: AUP for NANOG? Romain Komorn (Apr 14)
- Re: AUP for NANOG? Scott Grayban (Apr 14)
- Re: AUP for NANOG? Bill Nash (Apr 14)
- Re: AUP for NANOG? Steve Gibbard (Apr 14)
- Message not available
- Best Practices Knowledge Capture (was: Re: AUP for NANOG?) Jay R. Ashworth (Apr 15)
- Re: AUP for NANOG? Randy Bush (Apr 14)
- Comment for new folks and posting [was: AUP for NANOG?] Scott Weeks (Apr 14)
- Re: AUP for NANOG? Per Gregers Bilse (Apr 15)
- <Possible follow-ups>
- RE: AUP for NANOG? Hannigan, Martin (Apr 14)
- Re: AUP for NANOG? Gregory Hicks (Apr 15)