nanog mailing list archives

Re: The power of default configurations


From: Florian Weimer <fw () deneb enyo de>
Date: Thu, 07 Apr 2005 03:03:33 +0200


* Sean Donelan:

On Mon, 4 Apr 2005, Paul Vixie wrote:
adding more.  oh and as long as you're considering whether to restrict
things to your LAN/campus/ISP, i'm ready to see rfc1918 filters deployed...

Why does BIND forward lookups for RFC1918 addresses by default?

I think Paul complained about DNS queries with source addresses from
RFC 1918 space.  It's hard to stop this without using connected UDP
sockets.

Why isn't the default not to forward RFC1918 addresses (and martian
addresses).

Is the fraction of PTR lookups for RFC 1918 space really that high?

If a sysadmin is using BIND in a local network which uses RFC1918
address, those sysdmins can change their configuration?

They already have to, otherwise the queries won't hit their
authoritative servers.


Current thread: