nanog mailing list archives
Re: PAIX Outages
From: Leo Bicknell <bicknell () ufp org>
Date: Thu, 28 Apr 2005 14:11:40 -0400
In a message written on Thu, Apr 28, 2005 at 01:51:54PM -0400, Richard A Steenbergen wrote:
Personally I tend to suspect the general lack of uproar is a rather unfortunate (for them) sign that PAIX is no longer relevant when it comes to critical backbone infrastructures.
That, or a sign that operators are doing their job. There should be enough redundancy in the system that loss of any one site, for whatever reason, doesn't cause a major, or even minor disruption. -- Leo Bicknell - bicknell () ufp org - CCIE 3440 PGP keys at http://www.ufp.org/~bicknell/ Read TMBG List - tmbg-list-request () tmbg org, www.tmbg.org
Attachment:
_bin
Description:
Current thread:
- PAIX Outages Jay Patel (Apr 27)
- Re: PAIX Outages Randy Bush (Apr 27)
- Re: PAIX Outages Richard A Steenbergen (Apr 28)
- Re: PAIX Outages Leo Bicknell (Apr 28)
- Re: PAIX Outages Richard A Steenbergen (Apr 28)
- Re: PAIX Outages Alexander Koch (Apr 28)
- RE: PAIX Outages Neil J. McRae (Apr 29)
- Re: PAIX Outages Alexander Koch (Apr 29)
- Re: PAIX Outages Daniel Roesen (Apr 29)
- RE: PAIX Outages Neil J. McRae (Apr 29)
- Re: PAIX Outages Stephen J. Wilcox (Apr 29)
- Re: PAIX Outages Leo Bicknell (Apr 28)
- <Possible follow-ups>
- RE: PAIX Outages Huopio Kauto (Apr 28)
- Re: PAIX Outages Brandon Butterworth (Apr 29)