nanog mailing list archives
Re: SkyCache/Cidera replacement?
From: jason () dixongroup net
Date: Mon, 20 Sep 2004 15:31:03 -0400 (EDT)
Hadn't it gotten to the point shortly before Cidera folded that the satellite bandwidth was so insufficient for a "full feed" that it was of questionable value?...or was it still fine if you wanted a usenet feed with no binaries?
Probably. Yes. IIRC, a full feed of usenet (3 years ago) was approx 250GB+ per day. The overwhelming majority of that was multi-part binaries. Cut them out and you should have plenty of room across the transponder, which (again, 3 years ago) was capable of DS3 capacity. I haven't had the misfortune of dealing with usenet feeds since then, so I'm unfamiliar with the requirements of nntp peering today. -J.
Current thread:
- SkyCache/Cidera replacement? Rick Chavez (Sep 20)
- Re: SkyCache/Cidera replacement? Jay Hennigan (Sep 20)
- Re: SkyCache/Cidera replacement? jason (Sep 20)
- Re: SkyCache/Cidera replacement? Jon Lewis (Sep 20)
- Re: SkyCache/Cidera replacement? jason (Sep 20)
- Re: SkyCache/Cidera replacement? Andrew - Supernews (Sep 20)
- Re: SkyCache/Cidera replacement? Majdi Abbas (Sep 20)
- Re: SkyCache/Cidera replacement? Dan Mahoney, System Admin (Sep 20)
- Re: SkyCache/Cidera replacement? Matthew Crocker (Sep 20)
- Re: SkyCache/Cidera replacement? Adrian Chadd (Sep 20)
- Re: SkyCache/Cidera replacement? Nils Ketelsen (Sep 21)
- Re: SkyCache/Cidera replacement? jason (Sep 20)
- Re: SkyCache/Cidera replacement? Jon Lewis (Sep 20)
- Message not available
- Re: SkyCache/Cidera replacement? Jon Lewis (Sep 20)
- Re: SkyCache/Cidera replacement? Paul G (Sep 20)