nanog mailing list archives
Re: RIP in Operation
From: Patrick W Gilmore <patrick () ianai net>
Date: Thu, 16 Sep 2004 11:29:38 -0400
On Sep 16, 2004, at 11:20 AM, Stephen J. Wilcox wrote:
On Thu, 16 Sep 2004, Abhishek Verma wrote:I am sure that there would be very few people running RIP in their networks,Actually you'd be surprised.. its quite common as its very simple and used on a lot of low end routers in favor of more cpu/memory intensive ospf/isis. I knowof a number of customers we have using RIP v1 and v2
It's also the only protocol (currently in use) which doesn't require an adjacency to be formed, allowing interesting tricks and one-way communications.
-- TTFN, patrick
Current thread:
- RIP in Operation Abhishek Verma (Sep 16)
- Re: RIP in Operation bmanning (Sep 16)
- Re: RIP in Operation Tulip Rasputin (Sep 16)
- Re: RIP in Operation Stephen J. Wilcox (Sep 16)
- Re: RIP in Operation Patrick W Gilmore (Sep 16)
- Re: RIP in Operation Robert A. Hayden (Sep 16)
- Re: RIP in Operation sthaug (Sep 16)
- Re: RIP in Operation Robert A. Hayden (Sep 16)
- Re: RIP in Operation Stephen J. Wilcox (Sep 16)
- Re: RIP in Operation Tony Li (Sep 16)