nanog mailing list archives
Re: European Nanog?
From: Suresh Ramasubramanian <suresh () outblaze com>
Date: Thu, 16 Sep 2004 10:08:56 +0530
Randy Bush [15/09/04 09:11 -1000]:
this is a problem with eof, nanog, apricot, ... the actual running and decision-making is not done by operators. it is done by the usual well-meaning people representing operators. and, of course,
At least in apricot's case, if anybody wants to help, and proves that he can help effectively, he / she is welcome to help .. it kind of boils down to "X, Y and Z are willing to roll up their sleeves and help in everything from chasing after sponsors, running a registration system etc to actually coming into the conference venue with a satchel full of access points and wiring the place up" Operators, vendors, people who represent the operator community, it doesn't really matter at all. Anyone who is willing to spare technical / organizational expertise and considerable chunks of spare time is welcome to step up to the plate and volunteer. srs (not speaking for the apricot mgmt committee here)
Current thread:
- Re: European Nanog?, (continued)
- Re: European Nanog? Arnold Nipper (Sep 13)
- RE: European Nanog? Neil J. McRae (Sep 13)
- Re: European Nanog? Arnold Nipper (Sep 13)
- RE: European Nanog? Neil J. McRae (Sep 13)
- Re: European Nanog? Arnold Nipper (Sep 13)
- RE: European Nanog? Randy Bush (Sep 13)
- Re: European Nanog? Roland Perry (Sep 14)
- Re: European Nanog? Daniel Karrenberg (Sep 15)
- Re: European Nanog? Arnold Nipper (Sep 15)
- Re: European Nanog? Randy Bush (Sep 15)
- Re: European Nanog? Suresh Ramasubramanian (Sep 15)
- Re: European Nanog? william(at)elan.net (Sep 13)
- Re: European Nanog? Arnold Nipper (Sep 13)
- Re: European Nanog? Randy Bush (Sep 13)
- Re: European Nanog? Stephen J. Wilcox (Sep 13)
- Re: European Nanog? Randy Bush (Sep 13)
- Re: European Nanog? Paul G (Sep 13)
- Re: European Nanog? Suresh Ramasubramanian (Sep 12)
- Re: European Nanog? Ken Gilmour (Sep 13)