nanog mailing list archives
Re: "Intel calls for Internet overhaul"
From: Rik van Riel <riel () surriel com>
Date: Fri, 10 Sep 2004 09:24:18 -0400 (EDT)
On Thu, 9 Sep 2004, Rachael Treu-Gomes wrote:
And tunnels in tunnels in tunnels... I see some deep recursion fun here.
I can see some nice routing loops coming up, with packets for tunnel endpoints being routed through the tunnel interface itself, etc... ;) Rik -- "Debugging is twice as hard as writing the code in the first place. Therefore, if you write the code as cleverly as possible, you are, by definition, not smart enough to debug it." - Brian W. Kernighan
Current thread:
- Re: "Intel calls for Internet overhaul", (continued)
- Re: "Intel calls for Internet overhaul" Tom (UnitedLayer) (Sep 09)
- Re: "Intel calls for Internet overhaul" Peter H Salus (Sep 09)
- Re: "Intel calls for Internet overhaul" Dan Mahoney, System Admin (Sep 09)
- Re: "Intel calls for Internet overhaul" Joel Jaeggli (Sep 09)
- Re: "Intel calls for Internet overhaul" Randy Bush (Sep 09)
- RE: "Intel calls for Internet overhaul" Brance Amussen :)_S (Sep 09)
- RE: "Intel calls for Internet overhaul" Lucy E. Lynch (Sep 09)
- Re: "Intel calls for Internet overhaul" Eric A. Hall (Sep 10)
- Re: "Intel calls for Internet overhaul" Fergie (Paul Ferguson) (Sep 09)
- Re: "Intel calls for Internet overhaul" Rachael Treu-Gomes (Sep 09)
- Re: "Intel calls for Internet overhaul" Rik van Riel (Sep 10)
- Re: "Intel calls for Internet overhaul" Tom (UnitedLayer) (Sep 09)
- Re: "Intel calls for Internet overhaul" Mehmet Akcin (Sep 09)
- Re: "Intel calls for Internet overhaul" Rachael Treu-Gomes (Sep 09)