nanog mailing list archives
Re: Verisign vs. ICANN
From: Matthew Sullivan <matthew () sorbs net>
Date: Fri, 10 Sep 2004 08:50:43 +1000
Dan Hollis wrote:
It would only be useful if those people were also in a position to vigorously defend said patents when (and if) they were infringed.On Mon, 16 Aug 2004, Andre Oppermann wrote:PS: I will patent it myself to prevent Versign from doing this.Wouldnt it be beautiful if a bunch of people patented the hell out of various ways to exploit dns wildcarding, thus preventing verisign from doing anything useful with it at all...
/ Mat
Current thread:
- Re: Verisign vs. ICANN Matthew Sullivan (Sep 09)
- Re: Verisign vs. ICANN Eric Brunner-Williams in Portland Maine (Sep 09)
- Re: Verisign vs. ICANN Dan Hollis (Sep 09)
- Re: Verisign vs. ICANN Joe Rhett (Sep 10)
- Re: Verisign vs. ICANN Dan Hollis (Sep 10)
- Re: Verisign vs. ICANN Joe Rhett (Sep 10)
- Re: Verisign vs. ICANN Dan Hollis (Sep 10)
- Re: Verisign vs. ICANN Joe Rhett (Sep 10)