nanog mailing list archives
Re: aggregation & table entries
From: Randy Bush <randy () psg com>
Date: Wed, 13 Oct 2004 13:20:25 -0700
The second is a harder problem, because of the business decisions of some providers to source packets from prefixes that they do not announce.
i presume you are not intending to recommend that i drop packets that multi-homed customers hand me when they have also asked me to de-pref the prefix from which they come? i might be their backup for inbound, but they need to balance their outbound. randy
Current thread:
- Re: BCP38 making it work, solving problems, (continued)
- Re: BCP38 making it work, solving problems Suresh Ramasubramanian (Oct 13)
- Re: BCP38 making it work, solving problems Paul Vixie (Oct 13)
- Re: BCP38 making it work, solving problems Stephen J. Wilcox (Oct 13)
- aggregation & table entries bmanning (Oct 13)
- Re: aggregation & table entries Stephen Stuart (Oct 13)
- Re: aggregation & table entries bmanning (Oct 13)
- Re: aggregation & table entries joshua sahala (Oct 13)
- Re: aggregation & table entries Kevin Oberman (Oct 13)
- Re: aggregation & table entries bmanning (Oct 13)
- Re: aggregation & table entries Joe Provo (Oct 13)
- Re: aggregation & table entries Randy Bush (Oct 13)
- Re: aggregation & table entries Stephen Stuart (Oct 13)
- Re: aggregation & table entries Randy Bush (Oct 13)
- Re: aggregation & table entries Stephen Stuart (Oct 13)
- Re: aggregation & table entries Randy Bush (Oct 13)
- Re: aggregation & table entries Stephen Stuart (Oct 13)
- Re: aggregation & table entries Michael . Dillon (Oct 14)
- Re: aggregation & table entries Pekka Savola (Oct 13)
- Re: aggregation & table entries Daniel Roesen (Oct 14)
- Re: aggregation & table entries Pekka Savola (Oct 14)
- Re: aggregation & table entries Daniel Roesen (Oct 14)