nanog mailing list archives
Re: Blackhole Routes
From: Randy Bush <randy () psg com>
Date: Thu, 30 Sep 2004 18:04:39 -0700
If every BGP session in your network is protected by a max-prefix limit, no matter who leaks, the damage will be limited and contained.true, also not univeral,the problem with max-prefix is it does not say *which* prefixes. so even if the drop-bgp stoopidity is corrected, you could end up holding the bogus prefixes, not the good ones.true, however, my point was that not even the basics are being done :(
darwinian motion
Current thread:
- Re: Blackhole Routes Randy Bush (Sep 30)
- <Possible follow-ups>
- Re: Blackhole Routes Bill Stewart (Oct 01)
- RE: Blackhole Routes Matt Ryan (Oct 01)
- Re: Blackhole Routes Ian Dickinson (Oct 02)
- Re: Blackhole Routes Richard A Steenbergen (Oct 02)
- Re: Blackhole Routes Ian Dickinson (Oct 03)
- Re: Blackhole Routes Robert E . Seastrom (Oct 03)
- Re: Blackhole Routes Ian Dickinson (Oct 03)
- Re: Blackhole Routes Richard A Steenbergen (Oct 02)
- RE: Blackhole Routes Wayne Gustavus (nanog) (Oct 04)