Re: who gets a /32 [Re: IPV6 renumbering painless?]

[Kurt Erik Lindqvist <kurtis () kurtis pp se>]

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1


On 2004-11-22, at 19.29, william(at)elan.net wrote:

>  What is bad however is that IETF instead of pursuing it as
>    one effort has several of them including MULTI6, HIP, etc.

I don't see this as really true. MUTLI& is tasked with solving the 
problem of scalable site-multihoming for IPv6. HIP is tasked with 
defining the experimental protocol HIP. They are not mutually 
exclusive. I would actually like to argue that they are more 
complimentary.

- - kurtis -

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: PGP 8.1

iQA/AwUBQancq6arNKXTPFCVEQKD8wCfV11jFyqW1swUJyP6h0ToB8OR4N8An2NM
mxR7AmAf8qKnp/E3967ge1HO
=pJet
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----