nanog mailing list archives
RE: who gets a /32 [Re: IPV6 renumbering painless?]
From: "Richard Jimmerson" <richardj () arin net>
Date: Sun, 14 Nov 2004 19:43:18 -0500
Most of the existing IPv6 policy set went into effect August 1, 2002, in the ARIN region. The provisional IPv6 policy set in place before that did not exclude end-sites from obtaining IPv6 address space from ARIN. Richard Jimmerson Director of External Relations American Registry for Internet Numbers (ARIN)
-----Original Message----- From: owner-nanog () merit edu [mailto:owner-nanog () merit edu] On Behalf Of Pekka Savola Sent: Sunday, November 14, 2004 4:31 AM To: Joe Abley Cc: Stephen Sprunk; Paul Vixie; North American Noise and Off-topic Gripes Subject: who gets a /32 [Re: IPV6 renumbering painless?] On Sat, 13 Nov 2004, Joe Abley wrote:So you're claiming that any IPv6 PI applicant without yourpoliticalconnections to the IESG, ARIN, IANA, etc. can get a /32? I don't know exactly how many subnets/hosts ISC has, but I seriously doubt ISC could even get a PI /48 if you weren't buddies with the folks making allocation decisions.Nobody is required to count hosts or subnets in order to justify a request for PI v6 space from an RIR. All an applicant needsto do ismeet the criteria laid out in the policies, and addressesare assigned or allocated.Anybody who wants to examine the real policies should goand look atthe source documents at ARIN, but to paraphrase them here, an applicant who operates an exchange point, or operates critical Internet infrastructure can obtain a PI /48 assignment fromARIN forthat purpose; an applicant who has a plan to assign PA addresses to 200 other organisations within 2 years can get a /32 tomake the assignments from. Actually, the policy also specifies that you must not be an end-site. I'd be particularly interested in knowing what ISC said who would be their 200 other organizations who they intended to allocate the address space (their employees?), and how ISC would not be an end-site. This is a more generic issue, of course. -- Pekka Savola "You each name yourselves king, yet the Netcore Oy kingdom bleeds." Systems. Networks. Security. -- George R.R. Martin: A Clash of Kings
Current thread:
- Re: who gets a /32 [Re: IPV6 renumbering painless?], (continued)
- Re: who gets a /32 [Re: IPV6 renumbering painless?] Owen DeLong (Nov 29)
- Re: who gets a /32 [Re: IPV6 renumbering painless?] Joe Abley (Nov 29)
- Re: who gets a /32 [Re: IPV6 renumbering painless?] Owen DeLong (Nov 29)
- Re: who gets a /32 [Re: IPV6 renumbering painless?] Joe Abley (Nov 29)
- Re: who gets a /32 [Re: IPV6 renumbering painless?] bmanning (Nov 30)
- Re: who gets a /32 [Re: IPV6 renumbering painless?] bmanning (Nov 22)
- Re: who gets a /32 [Re: IPV6 renumbering painless?] Stephen Sprunk (Nov 25)
- Re: who gets a /32 [Re: IPV6 renumbering painless?] bmanning (Nov 26)
- Re: who gets a /32 [Re: IPV6 renumbering painless?] Iljitsch van Beijnum (Nov 22)
- Re: who gets a /32 [Re: IPV6 renumbering painless?] Paul Vixie (Nov 22)
- RE: who gets a /32 [Re: IPV6 renumbering painless?] Richard Jimmerson (Nov 14)
- Re: who gets a /32 [Re: IPV6 renumbering painless?] Daniel Roesen (Nov 14)
- Re: IPV6 renumbering painless? Owen DeLong (Nov 14)
- Re: IPV6 renumbering painless? Michael . Dillon (Nov 12)
- Re: IPV6 renumbering painless? Jeroen Massar (Nov 12)
- Re: IPV6 renumbering painless? alex (Nov 12)
- Re: IPV6 renumbering painless? Stephen Sprunk (Nov 13)
- Re: IPV6 renumbering painless? Paul Vixie (Nov 11)
- Re: IPV6 renumbering painless? Kevin Oberman (Nov 11)
- Re: IPV6 renumbering painless? Daniel Roesen (Nov 11)
- RE: IPV6 renumbering painless? Tony Hain (Nov 11)