nanog mailing list archives
Re: The Cidr Report
From: Patrick W Gilmore <patrick () ianai net>
Date: Sat, 13 Nov 2004 14:03:30 -0500
On Nov 13, 2004, at 10:18 AM, Roy wrote:
You have jumped to the conclusion that a customer of the cable company is not multi-homed. Bad assumption. I can tell you that there are multihomedcustomers behind what you would normally think of as a cable company.
You have assumed that they assumed. Bad assumption.Most of those deaggregated CIDRs do not show up behind any other AS. Nor are they in another AS.
If they are multi-homed, at least one, and hopefully both of those properties would hold.
-- TTFN, patrick
Current thread:
- Re: The Cidr Report, (continued)
- Re: The Cidr Report Patrick W Gilmore (Nov 05)
- Fwd: The Cidr Report David Barak (Nov 05)
- The Cidr Report cidr-report (Nov 12)
- Re: The Cidr Report Randy Bush (Nov 12)
- Re: The Cidr Report Christopher L. Morrow (Nov 12)
- Re: The Cidr Report Randy Bush (Nov 12)
- Re: The Cidr Report Christopher L. Morrow (Nov 12)
- Re: The Cidr Report Randy Bush (Nov 12)
- Re: The Cidr Report Joe Provo (Nov 13)
- RE: The Cidr Report Roy (Nov 13)
- Re: The Cidr Report Patrick W Gilmore (Nov 13)
- RE: The Cidr Report Christopher L. Morrow (Nov 13)
- Re: The Cidr Report Randy Bush (Nov 12)
- Re: The Cidr Report Austin Schutz (Nov 12)
- Re: The Cidr Report Daniel Roesen (Nov 12)
- Re: The Cidr Report Christopher L. Morrow (Nov 12)
- Re: The Cidr Report Simon Leinen (Nov 13)
- Re: The Cidr Report Geoff Huston (Nov 13)
- Re: The Cidr Report Hank Nussbacher (Nov 13)
- Re: The Cidr Report Geoff Huston (Nov 13)
- RE: The Cidr Report Randy Bush (Nov 12)