nanog mailing list archives
RE: The Cidr Report
From: "Christopher L. Morrow" <christopher.morrow () mci com>
Date: Sat, 13 Nov 2004 03:27:54 +0000 (GMT)
thanks brad :) atleast some answer was provided. On Fri, 12 Nov 2004, Roldan, Brad wrote:
There are no mistakes or excuses here. And there's definitely no renumbering going on. We were actually fully aggregated until an unfortunate incident this past May involving a distant service provider leaking our specifics. Gigs of traffic somehow vanished into Eastern Europe. The net result was deaggregation.
so, because someone 'hijacked' your more specifics you deaggregated entirely? Makes the 'everyone should prefix filter customers' talk sound more relevant everyday.
Current thread:
- RE: The Cidr Report, (continued)
- RE: The Cidr Report Christopher L. Morrow (Nov 13)
- Re: The Cidr Report Austin Schutz (Nov 12)
- Re: The Cidr Report Daniel Roesen (Nov 12)
- Re: The Cidr Report Christopher L. Morrow (Nov 12)
- Re: The Cidr Report Simon Leinen (Nov 13)
- Re: The Cidr Report Geoff Huston (Nov 13)
- Re: The Cidr Report Hank Nussbacher (Nov 13)
- Re: The Cidr Report Geoff Huston (Nov 13)
- RE: The Cidr Report Randy Bush (Nov 12)
- RE: The Cidr Report Christopher L. Morrow (Nov 12)
- Message not available
- RE: The Cidr Report Geoff Huston (Nov 13)
- RE: The Cidr Report Randy Bush (Nov 13)
- Re: The Cidr Report joshua sahala (Nov 13)