Re: Important IPv6 Policy Issue -- Your Input Requested

["Paul G" <paul () rusko us>]

----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Jørgen Hovland" <jorgen () hovland cx>
To: <nanog () merit edu>
Sent: Tuesday, November 09, 2004 8:07 PM
Subject: Re: Important IPv6 Policy Issue -- Your Input Requested


> ----- Original Message ----- 
> From: "Paul G" <paul () rusko us>
>
> > all jokes aside, 1918 allows for use of 1918 space in a private network
or
> > a
> > 'private internet [sic]' comprised of any such number of private
networks
> > as
> > agree to interconnect and cooperate in routing traffic sourced from and
> > destined to said space. it follows that any 1918-sourced traffic you
send
> > me
> > is illegitimate. out of curiosity, what kind of 'legitimate traffic',
> > considering i couldn't legitimately reply back, were you speaking of?
>
> I see I almost started an argument here. This was not my intention.
> Data from unconnected sockets only: Udp and icmp messages (unreachable
etc).

that's great. on behalf of everyone who's ever had the joy of
troubleshooting connectivity issues, i thank you, kind sir.

jokes aside again, why would you even bother sending back diagnostic data
when you've essentially halved the usefulness of it?

p