nanog mailing list archives
Re: Important IPv6 Policy Issue -- Your Input Requested
From: Adi Linden <adil () adis on ca>
Date: Mon, 8 Nov 2004 17:18:49 -0600
I don't know of any applications that require RFC1918 addresses to be deployed. (Clearly, this is not to say there are none.)
There are a number of good and reasonable uses for RFC1918 addresses. Just assume a individual/business/corporate LAN with client/server applications and statically configured ip numbering. RFC1918 addresses are perfect. NAT allows this network to be connected through any provider(s) to the Internet. There is no risk of collision of the internal address with publically routed addresses. To do without RFC1918 type address space it expect to a. Obtain unique, permanent address space for personal/business/corporate use b. Receive this unique, permanent address space at no cost c. Have this unique address space routed via any provider of my choosing Adi
Current thread:
- Important IPv6 Policy Issue -- Your Input Requested Leo Bicknell (Nov 08)
- Re: Important IPv6 Policy Issue -- Your Input Requested Joe Abley (Nov 08)
- Re: Important IPv6 Policy Issue -- Your Input Requested Leo Bicknell (Nov 08)
- Re: Important IPv6 Policy Issue -- Your Input Requested Joe Abley (Nov 08)
- Re: Important IPv6 Policy Issue -- Your Input Requested Leo Bicknell (Nov 08)
- Re: Important IPv6 Policy Issue -- Your Input Requested Pekka Savola (Nov 08)
- Re: Important IPv6 Policy Issue -- Your Input Requested Adi Linden (Nov 08)
- Re: Important IPv6 Policy Issue -- Your Input Requested Joe Abley (Nov 08)
- Re: Important IPv6 Policy Issue -- Your Input Requested Måns Nilsson (Nov 10)
- Re: Important IPv6 Policy Issue -- Your Input Requested Jeff Rosowski (Nov 11)
- Re: Important IPv6 Policy Issue -- Your Input Requested Nils Ketelsen (Nov 11)
- Re: Important IPv6 Policy Issue -- Your Input Requested Adi Linden (Nov 11)
- Re: Important IPv6 Policy Issue -- Your Input Requested Jeroen Massar (Nov 11)
- IPV6 renumbering painless? Michael . Dillon (Nov 11)
- RE: IPV6 renumbering painless? Tony Hain (Nov 11)
- Re: IPV6 renumbering painless? Leo Bicknell (Nov 11)
- Re: IPV6 renumbering painless? bmanning (Nov 11)
- Re: Important IPv6 Policy Issue -- Your Input Requested Leo Bicknell (Nov 08)
- Re: Important IPv6 Policy Issue -- Your Input Requested Joe Abley (Nov 08)