nanog mailing list archives
Re: Barracuda Networks Spam Firewall
From: "Stephen J. Wilcox" <steve () telecomplete co uk>
Date: Thu, 20 May 2004 00:38:50 +0100 (BST)
On Wed, 19 May 2004, Richard Cox wrote:
While this is verging off our remit here, I would clarify the point originally made, which is that if a URL - that is, a URL cited in the body of a message - points to an IP physically located in China, then that signals a high probability of the message being spam.
Altho this is probably not true if you're one of the billion or so people who live in or around China or are of Chinese origin.. Steve
Current thread:
- Re: Barracuda Networks Spam Firewall, (continued)
- Re: Barracuda Networks Spam Firewall Susan Harris (May 20)
- Re: Barracuda Networks Spam Firewall Valdis . Kletnieks (May 20)
- Re: Barracuda Networks Spam Firewall Rik van Riel (May 20)
- Re: Barracuda Networks Spam Firewall Eric A. Hall (May 20)
- Re: Barracuda Networks Spam Firewall Per Gregers Bilse (May 20)
- Re: Barracuda Networks Spam Firewall Paul Vixie (May 20)
- Re: Barracuda Networks Spam Firewall Peter Galbavy (May 20)
- Re: Barracuda Networks Spam Firewall Randy Bush (May 20)
- Re: Barracuda Networks Spam Firewall Eric A. Hall (May 20)
- Re: Barracuda Networks Spam Firewall Richard Cox (May 19)
- Re: Barracuda Networks Spam Firewall Stephen J. Wilcox (May 19)
- Re: Barracuda Networks Spam Firewall Dan Hollis (May 19)
- Re: Barracuda Networks Spam Firewall Randy Bush (May 19)
- Re: Barracuda Networks Spam Firewall Eric A. Hall (May 19)
- Re: Barracuda Networks Spam Firewall Richard Cox (May 20)
- Re: Barracuda Networks Spam Firewall Martin Hepworth (May 18)
- Re: Barracuda Networks Spam Firewall Matthew Crocker (May 18)
- Re: Barracuda Networks Spam Firewall Martin Hepworth (May 18)
- Port 5000 Geo. (May 18)
- Re: Port 5000 Erik Haagsman (May 18)