nanog mailing list archives
Re: BGP Exploit
From: Patrick W.Gilmore <patrick () ianai net>
Date: Mon, 3 May 2004 19:02:54 -0400
On May 3, 2004, at 6:26 PM, kwallace () pcconnection com wrote:
Now that the firestorm over implementing Md5 has quieted down a bit, is anybody aware of whether the exploit has been used? Feel free to reply off list.
I would also be interested in what %-age of peers are MD5-ized? And if anyone has had any operational issues with the MD5 process - issues contacting peers, software incompatibility, varying key synchronization processes, additional CPU, re-writing internal tools, monitoring MD5-ness, etc.?
Happy to collect the data off-list and reply with the summarized / anonymized stats.
-- TTFN, patrick
Current thread:
- BGP Exploit kwallace (May 03)
- Re: BGP Exploit Patrick W . Gilmore (May 03)
- Re: BGP Exploit Kurt Erik Lindqvist (May 04)
- Re: BGP Exploit Steven M. Bellovin (May 04)
- <Possible follow-ups>
- RE: BGP Exploit Smith, Donald (May 04)
- Re: BGP Exploit james (May 04)
- RE: BGP Exploit Stephen J. Wilcox (May 05)
- RE: BGP Exploit Smith, Donald (May 05)
- RE: BGP Exploit Smith, Donald (May 05)
- Re: BGP Exploit Patrick W . Gilmore (May 05)
- Re: BGP Exploit Christopher L. Morrow (May 05)
- Re: BGP Exploit Patrick W . Gilmore (May 06)
- Re: BGP Exploit Patrick W . Gilmore (May 05)