nanog mailing list archives
Re: Cisco's Statement about IPR Claimed in draft-ietf-tcpm-tcpsecure
From: "Peter Galbavy" <peter.galbavy () knowtion net>
Date: Thu, 13 May 2004 09:13:19 +0100
Todd Vierling wrote:
With this and the patent funny business, I don't know if I can roll my eyes any further into the back of my head.
I dunno, but perhaps there is a (new) policy of applying for a patent for every bug fix or code change in IOS - just in case the incompetent USPTO grants one in a thousand out of boredom. Peter
Current thread:
- Cisco's Statement about IPR Claimed in draft-ietf-tcpm-tcpsecure David Krause (May 11)
- Re: Cisco's Statement about IPR Claimed in draft-ietf-tcpm-tcpsecure Tony Li (May 11)
- Re: Cisco's Statement about IPR Claimed in draft-ietf-tcpm-tcpsecure Todd Vierling (May 12)
- Re: Cisco's Statement about IPR Claimed in draft-ietf-tcpm-tcpsecure Peter Galbavy (May 13)
- Re: Cisco's Statement about IPR Claimed in draft-ietf-tcpm-tcpsecure Valdis . Kletnieks (May 13)
- Re: Cisco's Statement about IPR Claimed in draft-ietf-tcpm-tcpsecure Todd Vierling (May 13)
- Re: Cisco's Statement about IPR Claimed in draft-ietf-tcpm-tcpsecure Iljitsch van Beijnum (May 13)
- Re: Cisco's Statement about IPR Claimed in draft-ietf-tcpm-tcpsecure Todd Vierling (May 13)
- Re: Cisco's Statement about IPR Claimed in draft-ietf-tcpm-tcpsecure Henning Brauer (May 13)
- Re: Cisco's Statement about IPR Claimed in draft-ietf-tcpm-tcpsecure Steven M. Bellovin (May 13)
- Re: Cisco's Statement about IPR Claimed in draft-ietf-tcpm-tcpsecure Patrick W . Gilmore (May 13)
- RE: Cisco's Statement about IPR Claimed in draft-ietf-tcpm-tcpsecure Terry Baranski (May 19)
- Re: Cisco's Statement about IPR Claimed in draft-ietf-tcpm-tcpsecure Iljitsch van Beijnum (May 13)