nanog mailing list archives
Re: Spamcop
From: Chris Brenton <cbrenton () chrisbrenton org>
Date: Tue, 11 May 2004 18:11:49 -0400
On Tue, 2004-05-11 at 16:35, Guðbjörn S. Hreinsson wrote:
Possible someone on the list didn't understand the content, didn't realize this was sent via a mailing lists and submitted this as a spam message to SPAMCOP. Less likely someone didn't know how to get off the mailing list and this was the result. In both cases the submitter exercised bad judgement. But the mailing list could be more helpful as well.
Further, Spamcop should implement some form of check to verify that the e-mail is in fact spam before they go pointing the finger and/or blocking mail servers. The problem of end users leveraging Spamcop to get them off of mailing lists or a simple way of DoSsing a discussion forum would become mute if some form of sanity checking was in place. Cheers, Chris
Current thread:
- Spamcop Vicky Rode (May 11)
- Re: Spamcop Valdis . Kletnieks (May 11)
- Re: Spamcop Christopher McCrory (May 11)
- Re: Spamcop Robert E. Seastrom (May 12)
- Re: Spamcop Eric Brunner-Williams (May 11)
- Re: Spamcop Guðbjörn S . Hreinsson (May 11)
- Message not available
- Re: Spamcop Guðbjörn S . Hreinsson (May 11)
- Re: Spamcop Valdis . Kletnieks (May 11)
- Message not available
- Re: Spamcop Chris Brenton (May 11)
- Re: Spamcop Laurence F. Sheldon, Jr. (May 11)
- Re: Spamcop Chris Brenton (May 11)
- Re: Spamcop Laurence F. Sheldon, Jr. (May 11)
- Re: Spamcop chuck goolsbee (May 11)
- <Possible follow-ups>
- Re: Spamcop Gregory Hicks (May 11)
- Re: Spamcop Jared Mauch (May 11)
- Re: Spamcop JC Dill (May 11)
- Re: Spamcop Laurence F. Sheldon, Jr. (May 11)
- Re: Spamcop Jared Mauch (May 11)
- Re: Spamcop Richard Welty (May 11)