nanog mailing list archives

Re: 2001:590::/32 announced by both AS4436 (nLayer) and AS4474 (Global Village, no contact in whois, but seems to be nLayer...)

From: bill <bmanning () karoshi com>
Date: Tue, 16 Mar 2004 10:00:58 -0800 (PST)

On 16 Mar 2004, at 12:03, bill wrote:

 there is no problem with a prefix being
 announced by more than one ASN.


Bill: have you done any measurement exercises to determine whether this 
is, in fact, an issue? Or was your comment above based on the protocol, 
rather than deployed implementations of the protocol?


        based on the protocol, not any specific implementation 
        thereof.

Joe

Current thread:

2001:590::/32 announced by both AS4436 (nLayer) and AS4474 (Global Village, no contact in whois, but seems to be nLayer...) Jeroen Massar (Mar 16)
- Re: 2001:590::/32 announced by both AS4436 (nLayer) and AS4474 (Global Village, no contact in whois, but seems to be nLayer...) william(at)elan.net (Mar 16)
  - Re: 2001:590::/32 announced by both AS4436 (nLayer) and AS4474 (Global Village, no contact in whois, but seems to be nLayer...) John Payne (Mar 16)
  - RE: 2001:590::/32 announced by both AS4436 (nLayer) and AS4474 (Global Village, no contact in whois, but seems to be nLayer...) Matthew Kaufman (Mar 16)
- Re: 2001:590::/32 announced by both AS4436 (nLayer) and AS4474 (Global Village, no contact in whois, but seems to be nLayer...) bill (Mar 16)
  - RE: 2001:590::/32 announced by both AS4436 (nLayer) and AS4474 (Global Village, no contact in whois, but seems to be nLayer...) Jeroen Massar (Mar 16)
    - Re: 2001:590::/32 announced by both AS4436 (nLayer) and AS4474 (Global Village, no contact in whois, but seems to be nLayer...) Richard A Steenbergen (Mar 16)
    - RE: 2001:590::/32 announced by both AS4436 (nLayer) and AS4474 (Global Village, no contact in whois, but seems to be nLayer...) Jeroen Massar (Mar 16)
    - RE: 2001:590::/32 announced by both AS4436 (nLayer) and AS4474 (Global Village, no contact in whois, but seems to be nLayer...) Jeroen Massar (Mar 16)
  - Re: 2001:590::/32 announced by both AS4436 (nLayer) and AS4474 (Global Village, no contact in whois, but seems to be nLayer...) Joe Abley (Mar 16)
    - Re: 2001:590::/32 announced by both AS4436 (nLayer) and AS4474 (Global Village, no contact in whois, but seems to be nLayer...) bill (Mar 16)
  - Re: 2001:590::/32 announced by both AS4436 (nLayer) and AS4474 (Global Village, no contact in whois, but seems to be nLayer...) Richard A Steenbergen (Mar 16)
- <Possible follow-ups>
- Re: 2001:590::/32 announced by both AS4436 (nLayer) and AS4474 (Global Village, no contact in whois, but seems to be nLayer...) Michael . Dillon (Mar 16)
  - RE: 2001:590::/32 announced by both AS4436 (nLayer) and AS4474 (Global Village, no contact in whois, but seems to be nLayer...) Jeroen Massar (Mar 16)
    - RE: 2001:590::/32 announced by both AS4436 (nLayer) and AS4474 (Global Village, no contact in whois, but seems to be nLayer...) Jeff S Wheeler (Mar 16)
    - RE: 2001:590::/32 announced by both AS4436 (nLayer) and AS4474(Global Village, no contact in whois, but seems to be nLayer...) Jeroen Massar (Mar 16)
- RE: 2001:590::/32 announced by both AS4436 (nLayer) and AS4474 (Global Village, no contact in whois, but seems to be nLayer...) Jeroen Massar (Mar 16)