nanog mailing list archives
Re: Packet Kiddies Invade NANOG
From: Michael.Dillon () radianz com
Date: Tue, 16 Mar 2004 10:54:43 +0000
People should be worried about stuff like this. Banetele is a facilities-based network operator in Norway and these guys are directly attacking their BGP sessions to put them off the air. Assuming that they are not sourcing the attacks in Banetele's AS, then you, the peer of Banetele are delivering the packet stream that kills the BGP session. How long before peering agreements require ACLs in border routers so that only BGP peering routers can source traffic destined to your BGP speaking routers? (08:48:02) <#sigdie!OseK_> i just collapsed banetele's BGP announcement (08:48:43) <#sigdie!p> i dunno banetele looks dead (08:48:48) <#sigdie!p> or maybe im just lagging (08:49:00) <#sigdie!OseK_> ... BitchX: Sent server ping to [irc.banetele.no] (08:49:00) <#sigdie!OseK_> ... Server pong from irc.banetele.no 0.8224 seconds (08:49:12) <#sigdie!p> bash-2.05a$ telnetirc.banetele.no 6667 (08:49:13) <#sigdie!p> Trying 213.239.111.2... (08:49:16) <#sigdie!OseK_> thats cuz I collapsed their BGP announcement by nailing their router head on(08:49:26) <#sigdie!OseK_> but they have a secondary route to efnet (08:49:30) <#sigdie!_mre|42o> BGP announcement? (08:49:31) <#sigdie!OseK_> thru their multihomed connection (08:49:32) <#sigdie!OseK_> yeah (08:49:37) <#sigdie!OseK_> they have a collapsable route (08:49:44) <#sigdie!OseK_> using the border gateway protocl (08:49:54) <#sigdie!OseK_> hey have to announce to a pool (08:49:58) <#sigdie!OseK_> in order to establish their route (08:50:07) <#sigdie!OseK_> but if thye get hit enough their router drops the announcements (08:50:10) <#sigdie!OseK_> and they lose their routes (08:50:14) <#sigdie!OseK_> its wierd (08:50:21) <#sigdie!OseK_> i dont quite understand how it works myself
Current thread:
- Re: Packet Kiddies Invade NANOG, (continued)
- Re: Packet Kiddies Invade NANOG Brian Bruns (Mar 15)
- Re: Packet Kiddies Invade NANOG ren (Mar 15)
- Re: Packet Kiddies Invade NANOG james (Mar 15)
- Re: Packet Kiddies Invade NANOG Laurence F. Sheldon, Jr. (Mar 15)
- Re: Packet Kiddies Invade NANOG David Barak (Mar 15)
- Re: Packet Kiddies Invade NANOG Stefan Larsson (Mar 15)
- Re: Packet Kiddies Invade NANOG albertpublic (Mar 16)
- Re: Fw: Packet Kiddies Invade NANOG albertpublic (Mar 16)
- Re: Packet Kiddies Invade NANOG albertpublic (Mar 16)
- Re: Packet Kiddies Invade NANOG jqtaxpayer (Mar 16)
- Re: Packet Kiddies Invade NANOG Michael . Dillon (Mar 16)
- Re: Packet Kiddies Invade NANOG Stephen J. Wilcox (Mar 16)
- Re: Packet Kiddies Invade NANOG sthaug (Mar 16)
- Re: Packet Kiddies Invade NANOG Alexei Roudnev (Mar 16)
- Re: Packet Kiddies Invade NANOG sthaug (Mar 16)
- Re: Packet Kiddies Invade NANOG jlewis (Mar 16)
- Re: Packet Kiddies Invade NANOG william(at)elan.net (Mar 16)
- Re: Packet Kiddies Invade NANOG Tom (UnitedLayer) (Mar 16)
- Re: Packet Kiddies Invade NANOG Stephen J. Wilcox (Mar 16)
- Re: Packet Kiddies Invade NANOG David Barak (Mar 16)