nanog mailing list archives
Re: Enterprise Multihoming
From: "Laurence F. Sheldon, Jr." <LarrySheldon () cox net>
Date: Fri, 12 Mar 2004 10:19:04 -0600
Stephen J. Wilcox wrote:
IMHO avoid multihoming. You will know when you are big enough and you *need* to do it, if you're not sure or you only want to do it cause you heard everyone else is and its real cool then I suggest you dont.
There _is_ another element that I tried to point to yesterday. If you are on record for making arguments about how there are better ways to spend the money, and your boss's boss gets replaced by a kid with all the tap-dance skills needed to sell smoke, flash and sizzle, what you become is "unemployed". And somebody half your age or less at less than your salary puts in the new OCn's (n = 3-12) and all the rest. Being right is important, but ... -- Requiescas in pace o email
Current thread:
- Re: Enterprise Multihoming, (continued)
- Re: Enterprise Multihoming Petri Helenius (Mar 11)
- Re: Enterprise Multihoming E.B. Dreger (Mar 11)
- Re: Enterprise Multihoming Gregory Taylor (Mar 11)
- Re: Enterprise Multihoming Pekka Savola (Mar 11)
- Re: Enterprise Multihoming Marshall Eubanks (Mar 11)
- Re: Enterprise Multihoming Pekka Savola (Mar 11)
- Re: Enterprise Multihoming Scott McGrath (Mar 12)
- Re: Enterprise Multihoming Pekka Savola (Mar 11)
- Re: Enterprise Multihoming Laurence F. Sheldon, Jr. (Mar 12)
- Re: Enterprise Multihoming Howard C. Berkowitz (Mar 12)
- Re: Enterprise Multihoming Owen DeLong (Mar 11)
- Re: Enterprise Multihoming Laurence F. Sheldon, Jr. (Mar 11)
- Re: Enterprise Multihoming Marshall Eubanks (Mar 11)
- Re: Enterprise Multihoming E.B. Dreger (Mar 11)