nanog mailing list archives
Re: Enterprise Multihoming
From: Petri Helenius <pete () he iki fi>
Date: Thu, 11 Mar 2004 18:21:03 +0200
John Neiberger wrote:
Connecting to single AS makes you physically resilient but logically dependent on single entity, be that a provisioning system, routing protocol instance, etc. Depending on your requirements, the option of having somebody redistribute all their BGP routes into ISIS or OSPF might not worth looking forward to.I see a few upsides to this, but are there any real downsides?
Pete
Current thread:
- Enterprise Multihoming John Neiberger (Mar 11)
- Re: Enterprise Multihoming Daniel Roesen (Mar 11)
- Re: Enterprise Multihoming Jay Ford (Mar 11)
- Re: Enterprise Multihoming Crist Clark (Mar 11)
- Re: Enterprise Multihoming Arnold Nipper (Mar 11)
- Re: Enterprise Multihoming Petri Helenius (Mar 11)
- Re: Enterprise Multihoming E.B. Dreger (Mar 11)
- Re: Enterprise Multihoming Petri Helenius (Mar 11)
- Re: Enterprise Multihoming E.B. Dreger (Mar 11)
- Re: Enterprise Multihoming E.B. Dreger (Mar 11)
- Re: Enterprise Multihoming Gregory Taylor (Mar 11)
- Re: Enterprise Multihoming Pekka Savola (Mar 11)
- Re: Enterprise Multihoming Marshall Eubanks (Mar 11)
- Re: Enterprise Multihoming Pekka Savola (Mar 11)
- Re: Enterprise Multihoming Scott McGrath (Mar 12)
- Re: Enterprise Multihoming Pekka Savola (Mar 11)