nanog mailing list archives
Re: SPAM Prevention/Blacklists
From: Steve Linford <linford () spamhaus org>
Date: Thu, 4 Mar 2004 20:57:50 +0000
From Richard Welty, received 3/3/04, 19:36 -0500 (GMT):
Mind if I ask why you don't use the sbl-xbl?keep in mind that the sbl is the combination of "sbl classic" with the xbl, where the xbl is currently a feed of the cbl that may at a later date incorporate additional lists or data.
I trust you mean sbl-xbl is the combination... sbl.spamhaus.org (direct spam sources & spam outfits) xbl.spamhaus.org (3rd party exploits/trojans/proxies/etc.) sbl-xbl.spamhaus.org (combination of the two) -- Steve Linford The Spamhaus Project http://www.spamhaus.org
Current thread:
- SPAM Prevention/Blacklists Brandon Shiers (Mar 03)
- Re: SPAM Prevention/Blacklists Nathan Allen Stratton (Mar 03)
- Re: SPAM Prevention/Blacklists Scott Call (Mar 03)
- Re: SPAM Prevention/Blacklists Nathan Allen Stratton (Mar 03)
- Re: SPAM Prevention/Blacklists Patrick W . Gilmore (Mar 03)
- Re: SPAM Prevention/Blacklists Scott Call (Mar 03)
- Re: SPAM Prevention/Blacklists Nathan Allen Stratton (Mar 03)
- Re: SPAM Prevention/Blacklists Patrick W . Gilmore (Mar 03)
- Re: SPAM Prevention/Blacklists Richard Welty (Mar 03)
- Re: SPAM Prevention/Blacklists Patrick W . Gilmore (Mar 03)
- Re: SPAM Prevention/Blacklists Richard Welty (Mar 03)
- Re: SPAM Prevention/Blacklists Steve Linford (Mar 04)
- Re: SPAM Prevention/Blacklists Richard Welty (Mar 03)
- Re: SPAM Prevention/Blacklists Steven Champeon (Mar 05)
- <Possible follow-ups>
- Re: SPAM Prevention/Blacklists Anne P. Mitchell, Esq. (Mar 04)
- Re: SPAM Prevention/Blacklists Anne P. Mitchell, Esq. (Mar 06)