nanog mailing list archives
Re: Redirecting mail (Re: Throttling mail)
From: "J.D. Falk" <jdfalk () cybernothing org>
Date: Thu, 25 Mar 2004 13:29:54 -0800
On 03/25/04, Valdis.Kletnieks () vt edu wrote:
On the other hand, it's probably more effective to find some way of making the Cisco gear block outbound 25 from abusive machines.
Inbound also. The spammers have been using triangular routing for a while. (They dial in someplace, get an IP, and use a broadband connection to send packets with a forged source address of that dialup IP.) -- J.D. Falk "be crazy dumbsaint of the mind" <jdfalk () cybernothing org> -- Jack Kerouac
Current thread:
- Re: Redirecting mail (Re: Throttling mail), (continued)
- Re: Redirecting mail (Re: Throttling mail) Scott McGrath (Mar 25)
- Re: Redirecting mail (Re: Throttling mail) Valdis . Kletnieks (Mar 25)
- Re: Redirecting mail (Re: Throttling mail) Deepak Jain (Mar 25)
- Re: Redirecting mail (Re: Throttling mail) Valdis . Kletnieks (Mar 25)
- Re: Redirecting mail (Re: Throttling mail) Adi Linden (Mar 25)
- Re: Redirecting mail (Re: Throttling mail) Petri Helenius (Mar 25)
- Re: Redirecting mail (Re: Throttling mail) Adi Linden (Mar 25)
- Re: Redirecting mail (Re: Throttling mail) Valdis . Kletnieks (Mar 25)
- Re: Redirecting mail (Re: Throttling mail) Adi Linden (Mar 25)
- Re: Redirecting mail (Re: Throttling mail) Valdis . Kletnieks (Mar 25)
- Re: Redirecting mail (Re: Throttling mail) J.D. Falk (Mar 25)