nanog mailing list archives

RE: Can a customer take IP's with them?


From: "David Schwartz" <davids () webmaster com>
Date: Wed, 23 Jun 2004 14:36:56 -0700



On Tue, 22 Jun 2004, David Schwartz wrote:

In other words, customer is asking a court to rule whether or
not IP space
should be portable, when an industry-supported organization (ARIN) has
made policy that the space is in fact not portable. It can be further
argued that the court could impose a TRO that would
potentially negatively
affect the operation of my network.

    A court will likely decide this based upon the terms of
your contract and
what the court thinks is fair. They will likely give very little
consideration to common practice or ARIN's rules.

Actually, I don't think that's the case. ARIN still owns the numbers, NAC
is just leasing them. Therefore, ARINs rules supercede anything
contractual between NAC and the customer.

        Yes, but the court won't care about that. They'll simply enjoin the ISP
from interfering with the customer's use of those IP addresses. ARIN can do
whatever they want about it, but that would be a totally separate issue.

For instance, if what you say were true, all an ISP would have to do in
order to "sell" their IP space is to create a contract stating that they
are doing so.

        Exactly. If they did that, a court would likely enjoin them from making any
action to interfere with the customer's use of those IP addresses. A court
would likely find the contract binding upon the parties that entered into
it.

Contracts are rarely as binding as people think they are. Of course, I'm
no lawyer, I just hate paying them.

        Let me try to give you a hypothetical to show you why ARIN is irrelevent.
Suppose I am a member of the Longshoreman's assocation and you have a
contract to buy shrimp for $8/pound provided you only resell it to members
of the LA. You then enter into a contract with me to sell me shrimp for
$10/pound. But then I leave the LA. Ooops, now you can no longer resell me
the shrimp. So you break our contract and I sue you. Does your contract with
your shrimp provider matter? If you continue to sell me shrimp even though
I'm not in the LA, who does your shrimp supplier sue? You or me?

        DS



Current thread: