nanog mailing list archives

RE: [Fwd: [IP] Feds: VoIP a potential haven for terrorists]


From: "Hannigan, Martin" <hannigan () verisign com>
Date: Sat, 19 Jun 2004 17:55:25 -0400




It's not just a funding bill. It provided $500MM for carrier network
upgrades and for switch software compliance. That fund has been exhausted
from what I have been told. It also clearly defined technical expectations
that carriers and manufacturers have to live up to.

All that being CALEA compliant means is that you are capable, as required, 
to provide service to a legal order i.e. pin register, trap, trace, DTMF
extration, flash hook operations ala three way calling, CALLER ID, and 
voice intercept. There's no "secret sauce" to CALEA. 

CALEA doesn't expand LEA's authority, it puts them on an even 
playing field with suspected criminals with regards to access.

-M


--
Martin Hannigan                         (c) 617-388-2663
VeriSign, Inc.                          (w) 703-948-7018
Network Engineer IV                       Operations & Infrastructure
hannigan () verisign com



-----Original Message-----
From: owner-nanog () merit edu [mailto:owner-nanog () merit edu]On Behalf Of
Sean Donelan
Sent: Saturday, June 19, 2004 1:49 AM
To: Stephen Sprunk
Cc: North American Noise and Off-topic Gripes
Subject: Re: [Fwd: [IP] Feds: VoIP a potential haven for terrorists]



On Fri, 18 Jun 2004, Stephen Sprunk wrote:
I'm told that most CALEA warrants only authorize a pen 
register, not an

CALEA and wiretaps are independent subjects.  You can have CALEA
obligations even if you never, ever implement a single wiretap. On
the other hand you may need to implement many wiretaps even though
you have no CALEA obligations.

For example, hotels and universities have traditionally been 
considered
not to have CALEA obligations.  However, both hotels and 
universities must
comply with court orders if law enforcement wants to wiretap 
one of their
phones.  Should CALEA be extended to hotels and universities? 
 Are hotels
and universities broadband Internet providers when they offer Internet
service in student dorm rooms or hotel rooms?

In reality, CALEA is a funding bill; it has very little to do with
technology.  Imagine if law enforcement thought DNA testing was too
expensive, so Congress passes a law requiring all doctors to purchase
DNA testing equipment and provide free DNA tests to law enforcement.
DNA is a complicated subject.  Few police officers are qualified to
analyze DNA. Instead law enforcement pays for professional DNA testing
when it needs DNA testing.

The FCC comment period has closed.  Everyone had an 
opportunity to submit
comments on the topic to the FCC.

Consult your own attorney if you want real legal advice.



Current thread: