nanog mailing list archives
Re: TCP-ACK vulnerability (was RE: SSH on the router)
From: "Alexei Roudnev" <alex () relcom net>
Date: Fri, 11 Jun 2004 00:46:49 -0700
I saw a few hackers (in sniffers, computers and personally), but I never saw anyone doing some hack without the reasons. Usually, if you do not see a reason, it is _your_ misunderstanding. Of course, reason can be as simple as _I have MS_ or as complicated as _here is my girlfriend, and if this system went down, she will be released earlier_ -:) /most common reason was, yep, _getting IRC control_). This allows to subtract (1) from severity , for this particular case. ----- Original Message ----- From: "Michel Py" <michel () arneill-py sacramento ca us> To: "Alexei Roudnev" <alex () relcom net>; <nanog () merit edu> Sent: Thursday, June 10, 2004 10:11 PM Subject: RE: TCP-ACK vulnerability (was RE: SSH on the router)
Alexei Roudnev wrote: Even if I (if been a hacker) scan your networks and find this switch (and you did not moved it out of routable P), I will have not any idea, what is it about, where this switch is, and have not any reason to break it...
You (being a hacker) need a _reason_ to break into something? Where does this come from? Michel.
Current thread:
- RE: TCP-ACK vulnerability (was RE: SSH on the router) Michel Py (Jun 10)
- Re: TCP-ACK vulnerability (was RE: SSH on the router) Alexei Roudnev (Jun 11)
- <Possible follow-ups>
- RE: TCP-ACK vulnerability (was RE: SSH on the router) Michel Py (Jun 11)