nanog mailing list archives
Re: Strange behavior of Catalyst4006
From: Robert Blayzor <rblayzor () inoc net>
Date: Mon, 28 Jun 2004 22:02:34 -0400
Joe Shen wrote:
The customer is allocated a Class C address block 192.168.5/24. And , they connect their network to ournetwork by using a firewall. The Interface on Cata4006 is set up as "no switchport", and inter-connecting subnet is configured between Cata4006 and firewall interface(10.10.1.122/30).
For starters 10.10.1.122/30 is not on a valid subnet boundry.Other things to make sure is that speed and duplex are always forced toward customer facing equipment. (you never know whats on the other side)
-- Robert Blayzor INOC, LLC rblayzor () inoc net
Current thread:
- Strange behavior of Catalyst4006 Joe Shen (Jun 28)
- RE: Strange behavior of Catalyst4006 Erik Amundson (Jun 28)
- Re: Strange behavior of Catalyst4006 Robert Blayzor (Jun 28)
- <Possible follow-ups>
- RE: Strange behavior of Catalyst4006 Greg Schwimer (Jun 28)
- RE: Strange behavior of Catalyst4006 Tony Rall (Jun 28)
- RE: Strange behavior of Catalyst4006 Scott McGrath (Jun 29)
- RE: Strange behavior of Catalyst4006 Joe Shen (Jun 28)
- Re: Strange behavior of Catalyst4006 Robert Blayzor (Jun 29)
- RE: Strange behavior of Catalyst4006 Pendergrass, Greg (Jun 29)